« // »

Stanford

Good:

  • Awesome research happening here; chances to do grammar induction with sparse data, or, more accurately, work on it.
  • They sure have funding.

Bad:

  • Beautiful lawns with no one on them.
  • Feels like southern California.
  • Definitely exclusive; will my patent application make up for my lack of published work?

6 Comments »

Comment by Blake
2009-11-13 16:09:22

What kind of patent do you have?

Comment by kit
2009-11-17 14:43:12

Application, not patent yet. It’s for a kind of predictive text input.

 
 
Comment by Mair
2009-11-13 21:54:34

Yoipes. Would a grad app really be expected to be published?
Do the lawns have “Do not Step on Grass” signs ?

Comment by kit
2009-11-17 14:51:54

So they tell me. And the lawns have no signs!

 
 
Comment by Elizabeth
2009-11-15 16:39:37

Are you applying to Stanford linguistics? Or another program?

Because I assure you, if it’s linguistics you do not need to have published. A conference presentation helps, but out of the people that I know who got in to every top program (I know four or five people like this and only one had even a conference presentation publication. And she is currently doing a double PhD in linguistics and brain and cog sci at MIT and is sort of an anomaly.)

Enjoy Stanford! did you meet chris potts?

Comment by kit
2009-11-17 14:51:07

Linguistics, yes. That’s good to hear. And no, I didn’t. But I met Dan Jurafsky!

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped=""> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

« // »